Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Weird, Wild, Wonderful 4 - Jan 31 - Feb 6

Some new findings, some old favourites.


ThinkShop, a blog on history, politics, and literature (among other interesting and intelligent musings). This blog is very well-written by an educator who lives in Switzerland.



nthposition online magazine is hard to categorize and certainly extensive. Here are the sections, just to give an idea: Strangeness, Politics, Opinion, Places, People, Poetry, Fiction, Reviews, Artreviews, Discussion, Contributors, Links. Good writing; some eye-opening essays.



In These Times, always interesting, always pointed, always good reading:
In These Times is a newsmagazine committed to political and economic democracy and opposed to the dominance of transnational corporations and the tyranny of marketplace values over human values. In These Times is dedicated to reporting the news with the highest journalistic standards; to informing and analyzing movements for social, environmental and economic justice; and to providing an accessible forum for debate about the policies that shape our future.


Delineating Art, the blog of artist Elaine Cheung offers commentary on art and life. Many of her posts begin with a particular artist or piece and then lead out to a larger point. Thoughtful and interesting.

Friday, January 22, 2010

Brewing Up History

US archaeologist Patrick McGovern does archaeology that I could eagerly take to, quite unlike the archaeology I encountered as an undergraduate - parabolic dental arcades and detailed descriptions of molars not exactly being my cup or tea.

Frank Thadeusz, in an article in Spiegel Online (Dec 24/09), writes about McGovern:  "The expert on identifying traces of alcohol in prehistoric sites reckons the thirst for a brew was enough of an incentive to start growing crops."

That's right - beer (and wine and mead) not bread as the primary impetus for humans to learn how to plant and raise grains and other crops.  Has our understanding of human history been in the grip of some version of the Women's Christian Temperance Union?

Well no more!

Evidence suggests that "the craft of making alcohol spread rapidly to various locations around the world during the Neolithic period." McGovern
carried the theory much further, aiming at a complete reinterpretation of humanity's history. His bold thesis, which he lays out in his book "Uncorking the Past. The Quest for Wine, Beer and Other Alcoholic Beverage," states that agriculture -- and with it the entire Neolithic Revolution, which began about 11,000 years ago -- are ultimately results of the irrepressible impulse toward drinking and intoxication.
McGovern finds traces and sometimes whole preserved samples of different alcoholic concoctions from around the world:

"Available evidence suggests that our ancestors in Asia, Mexico, and Africa cultivated wheat, rice, corn, barley, and millet primarily for the purpose of producing alcoholic beverages," McGovern explains. While they were at it, he believes, drink-loving early civilizations managed to ensure their basic survival.
The "hybrid swill" our Neolithic ancestors produced was nutritious and much easier to make than bread, although one scenario for manufacture isn't so appealing:

Lacking any knowledge of chemistry, prehistoric humans eager for the intoxicating effects of alcohol apparently mixed clumps of rice with saliva in their mouths to break down the starches in the grain and convert them into malt sugar...These pioneering brewers would then spit the chewed up rice into their brew. Husks and yeasty foam floated on top of the liquid, so they used long straws to drink from narrow necked jugs.

Thank goodness for modern brewing techniques and for centuries of the winemaker's art. (Although anyone who has ever tried it can attest to the effects of drinking beer through a straw!)



Perhaps as we raise a glass to our Neolithic forebears, we can find a reason in this new understanding of human history to take ourselves less seriously.


Sunday, January 3, 2010

Soiree's Past Week

At My Soiree - December 28 - January 2

Ready to go for the new year and saying goodbye to the last of last year's posts. Enjoy!


Faux or No? - December 28/09
Happy New Year - December 31/09
Weird, Wild, Wonderful Four - Dec 27 to Jan 2 - January 2/10






(credit for red door photo)

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Weird, Wild, Wonderful Four - Dec 27 to Jan 2

I'm looking forward to another year of showcasing interesting, incredible blogs and websites.

The blog Women of History features mostly stories about women, past (often medieval) and present and spotlights women's issues around the world. Most posts are quite short and many are excerpts or summaries of other articles with links. The posts are really wide in their range - from Louisa May Alcott to Diane de Poitiers and Cleopatra. I really enjoy this blog for its range, its frequent posts, and its sheer volume of good information (826 posts in 2009!).


The website for the Poetry Foundation has so much to offer and would take several days to fully explore, but what resources they have! "The Poetry Foundation, publisher of Poetry magazine, is an independent literary organization committed to a vigorous presence for poetry in our culture. It exists to discover and celebrate the best poetry and to place it before the largest possible audience." If you love poetry, you'll love this site.



I came across this site for a documentary by Leo Sacks. The film, which is in production, is A Taste of Heaven: The Heartbreak Life of Raymond Myles, Gospel Genius of New Orleans about the life and death of the gay gospel star. His music is amazing, as his life and death story is for the intolerance and homophobia he endured. The site for the film showcases his incredible singing.


Last but not least, a humour blog - something I haven't checked out before. Of Cabbages & Kings is funny and intelligent with lots of interesting literary and cultural references.

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Jewish Women: Later 19th-Century Salons

guest blog by
Hels
Art and Architecture, mainly


I knew a great deal about the turn-of-the-century salon run by Gertrude and Leo Stein. But I had to rely on Bilski et al, Hertz and Wilhelmy-Dollinger for their original research on the 19th century history of women’s salons.

In the original post called Jewish Women: early 19th century salons, the main points were as follows. The salon allowed educated women to establish a venue in the privacy of their own homes. The women had to be well connected in their families, either to money or to culture. Since the husbands were busy with their businesses, the cultural role could legitimately be given to the wives. But male support was essential. In the salon, like-minded people could study literature, art, philosophy or music together, plus they could support both talented artists and writers. Each saloniere chose her own theme and selected the night of the week in which she wanted the salon to be held. Each saloniere had the responsibility to decide the salon's level of for¬m¬ality and the diversity of guests she favoured. As a result of the habitués and their conversations, the hostesses, guests and the arts flourished.


Schmid, Playing Schubert’s music, 1897

In reviewing the fabulous Jewish Museum Exhibition called Jewish Women and Their Salons, Deborah Hertz wrote: "Among the many difficult questions about salons posed by the exhibit, let us dwell for a moment on the problematic of the specifically Jewish salon tradition. Our curators claim very explicitly that over time more Jewish women hosted salons than Christian women did. If true, this is significant, since for a declassed Jewish woman, salon hosting could be a huge triumph over stereotype, considering that salons began as an aristocratic practice and were thought to set the tone for high culture. The curators make much of the outsider as insider notion; precisely because they were doubly marginal, as Jews and as women, the Jewish salonières became courageous modernists. They also argue that success in salon leadership helped bring about political emancipation, of particular importance for the 18th and early 19th centuries in central Europe. But both with modernism and with emancipation, we also must consider the dark side of success. We need to attend to how the Jewish salonières might have infuriated observers outraged at their extraordinary wealth, their connections to the powerful, and their exercise of patronage" (Hertz).

Herz raised a few of the key issues but there is another issue to be raised, I believe. The salonieres' roles in music, literature and philosophy were comprehensively considered, but I was particularly interested in their role as patrons of the visual arts. Some salonieres' families loved art above all other cultural pursuits, so their salons centred on paintings.

The salons’ impact on the art world could be seen at a time when wealthy non-French art buyers believed Impressionism belonged to the French tradition of shallow showiness. Jewish collectors, on the other hand, may have been less tradition-bound and more open to modern art. At least one salon was critically important. Carl Bernstein and Felicie Rosenthal Bernstein (1850-1908) married and left St Petersburg to set up their home in Berlin. Her salon was quite into modernity and artistic risk-taking. The Bernsteins were known as the first to buy French Impressionist art in Germany, and hang them on their walls in the salon. The artist Max Liebermann, later president of the Prussian Academy of Arts, was a regular particiant. At her salon, art discussions may have led to the founding of the influential Berlin Secession; she most certainly left a legacy to the Secession in her will..

Genevieve Straus was the daughter of the composer Jacques Fromental Halévy, widow of the composer Bizet and then wife of the successful lawyer Emil Straus. Her salon in Bvd Haussmann attracted literary intellectuals and political writers. Her large round drawing-room was decorated with wonderful art, including her own portrait by Delaunay. Remember the terrible Alfred Dreyfus trial, a military-political scandal that divided France in the 1890s and the early 1900s? Straus’ salon became headquarters of pro-Dreyfus supporters who managed to expose the French government’s involvement in the nasty army affair. Degas, Debussy and other anti-Semitic habitués stormed out of her salon in outrage, and never returned. Some salon regulars, who had enjoyed the Straus hospitality for years, crossed the street to avoid her.



Marcel Proust’s notebooks, given to Straus in thanks

Art historian and critic Bernard Berenson was Gertrude and Leo Stein’s greatest mentor. He showed them around the galleries in Florence, teaching them connoisseurship and helping them buy. In particular Berenson in¬trod¬uced Leo to Paul Cézanne and Henri Matisse. Gertrude and Leo persuaded their cousin Etta Cone to buy Picasso drawings, whenever that artist was short of funds. Back in Paris, the Steins were introducing artist to artist, patron to artist, patron to patron. Their salon had walls that were packed with paintings and sketches, and art books were spread over the table so young artists could admire and learn from established masters. Georges Braque, Fernand Léger, Sonia and Robert Delaunay, Francis Picabia, Marie Laurençin and Juan Gris, as well as Guillaume Apollinaire, frequented their salon. Even when Leo Stein moved permanently to Italy, Gertrude (and later Alice B Toklas) continued the Saturday night salon, providing food and mentoring to starving artists, especially those newly arrived from Eastern Europe.




Toklas and Stein in their Paris art salon

Finally back to literature and music. The intellectual orientation of Elsa Porges Bernstein’s family home was a powerful influence: Beethoven, Wagner, Goethe and Shakespeare. She ran Munich’s most famous salon, where the literary and artistic society gathered, and she was the author of Königskinder, with music by Humperdinck. Her father, Heinrich Porges, was very fond of Richard Wagner’s music and played a very active part in establishing the Bayreuth's festival. Elsa’s daughter Eva Bernstein later studied violin in Paris where she married Klaus Hauptmann, son of writer Gerhart Hauptmann. Gerhart, Otto Brahm and Richard Strauss had been intimates member of Elsa’s salon. In these cultural circles the links between Jewish and non Jewish families were very close.

Why did this 100 year period of non-Jewish/Jewish dialogue about culture come to a rather sad end? The disruption of war, leisure time being spent on travel and new mass media meant women of leisure spent their time differently. Polite, witty conversation was of little interest by 1900.


Bernstein’s rather modest salon



Read:

1. Bilski, Emily et al Jewish Women and Their Salons: The Power of Conversation, Jewish Museum New York, 2005.

2. Hertz, Deborah Jewish High Society in Old Regime Berlin, Syracuse UP, 1988.

3. Wilhelmy-Dollinger, Petra Berlin Salons: Late C18th to early C20th, http://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/berlin-salons-late-eighteenth-to-early-twentieth-century


Monday, November 2, 2009

Whale Songs from the Tower of Babel

The linguistic version of eugenics is alive and well.

With the exception of the aesthetics of certain languages valued by only a few academics, the world would suffer no siginificant loss if all of the extant Babel of 6000 languages disappeared. Of course, because it is already global in its scope, and for the sake of efficiency, English could be the one universal language.

And, contrary to what other linguists, anthropologists, and First Nations' elders know, the demise of language does not facilitate the loss of culture - residential schools in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand notwithstanding.

Important languages with an important body of writing - like Russian - could be preserved as museum pieces. Unfortunately, languages of indigenous cultures need not apply.

Such is the cavalier (and incorrect) attitude of John McWhorter, linguist and professor of literature.

McWhorter, in his article "The Cosmopolitan Tongue: The Universality of English" in World Affairs, offers all of these views and more, in an argument that astounds with its faulty logic and misrepresentation of the work of anthropologists and sociologists.

For instance, consider this passage:
In fact, all human groups could, somehow, exhibit the exact same culture—and yet their languages would be as different as they are now, because the differences are the result of geographical separation, leading to chance linguistic driftings... In this we would be like whales, whose species behave similarly everywhere, but have distinct “songs” as the result of happenstance. Who argues that we must preserve each pod of whales because of the particular songs they happen to have developed? The diversity of human languages is subject to the same evaluation: each one is the result of a roll of the dice.    [listen to whale songs]
Huh? Where to start? 

First, geographical separation accounts for much of a culture and is contained in that culture's language - the many Inuit words for different types of snow are irrevocably bound to building, hunting, food preservation, ritual, and other traditional practices.
How a Saharan cow herder and a Greenland seal hunter could possibly have the same culture is a fantasy McWhorter requires for his ideas to work.

Second, we are all homo sapiens, just as whales are whales Our cultures are our whale "songs," and, yes, they should be preserved. I wonder throughout McWhorter's essay just who it is who might decide on which human song stays and which goes.

Third, many people do argue to preserve each pod of whales and each distinct song. What's the alternative? Some select pods preserved, with taped songs and stuffed and mounted examples of all the others in a museum?


In another astounding turn, McWhorter states: "Native American groups would bristle at the idea that they are no longer meaningfully “Indian” simply because they no longer speak their ancestral tongue."

North American "Indian" elders ( e.g. Stephen Augustine and Leroy Littlebear and Narcisse Blood) and their counterparts around the world are doing whatever they can as fast and furiously as they can to preserve their languages precisely bacause they know that it will help to preserve their culture. Specifically, they speak frequently about the preservation of history and story as critical to the preservation of culture. Anthropologists and sociologists agree (e.g.Wade Davis and Cora Voyageur).

According to the elders, translation just doesn't cut it because so many cultural concepts are lost because there is no corresponding concept in English.

I'm surprised that McWhorter, as both a linguist and professor of literature, seems to have no idea of the place of narrative and history in culture - narrative and history passed on through language that, again, often does not translate easily.

For McWhorter, the only alternative to having English as the universal tongue, especially for indigenous peoples, comes at a terrible price:
The alternative, it would seem, is indigenous groups left to live in isolation—complete with the maltreatment of women and lack of access to modern medicine and technology typical of such societies. Few could countenance this as morally justified, and attempts to find some happy medium in such cases are frustrated by the simple fact that such peoples, upon exposure to the West, tend to seek membership in it.
In other words, stay home, you indigenes, in your backwardness and disease, or become Western and adopt English. If I were marking this in a student paper, I would slash through it with the notation "faulty either/or argument". Additionally, I would note "over-simplification"and "sweeping generalization "regarding the last sentence!

Thank goodness for all the elders working to preserve their languages, for anthropologists like Wade Davis and sociologists like Cora Voyageur, for all the NGO's working around the world. Thank goodness for such things as The Slow Food Movement, working against the constant pressure to standardize everything around the world (from soup to cedilla).

McWhorter's choice of the biblical story of  the Tower of Babel as somehow demonstrative of his point is ironic. Yes, the Tower of Babel story shows the curse and origin of many languages.

Does he forget, though, that it all came about because God thought humans with one language, building "a tower with its top in the heavens" (Genesis 11) were dangerous, uppity, and perhaps wouldn't stop with that one tower?

At the very least, many human "whale songs" guard against the standardization of everything. At best, they guard against tyranny.


(Kayak photo credit)
(Desert photo credit)
(Whale photo credit)